Silverlight Hack - Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked Silverlight & related .NET technologies https://silverlighthack.com/ http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0 en-GB https://silverlighthack.com/opml.axd http://www.dotnetblogengine.net/syndication.axd Bart Czernicki Silverlight Hack 0.000000 0.000000 DotNetKicks.com on Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked Trackback from DotNetKicks.com<br /><br />Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should of Looked https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_671694e7-6c06-406e-bd94-0b048ba6ec91 [email protected] (DotNetKicks.com) https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_671694e7-6c06-406e-bd94-0b048ba6ec91 Thu, 21 May 2009 20:02:08 -1100 DotNetKicks.com https://silverlighthack.com/pingback.axd https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_671694e7-6c06-406e-bd94-0b048ba6ec91 https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_671694e7-6c06-406e-bd94-0b048ba6ec91#comment https://silverlighthack.com/syndication.axd?post=671694e7-6c06-406e-bd94-0b048ba6ec91 DotNetShoutout on Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked Trackback from DotNetShoutout<br /><br />Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should of Looked https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_9293478c-d371-41d1-8c1f-b0bf6f8b9dbf [email protected] (DotNetShoutout) https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_9293478c-d371-41d1-8c1f-b0bf6f8b9dbf Thu, 21 May 2009 20:07:40 -1100 DotNetShoutout https://silverlighthack.com/pingback.axd https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_9293478c-d371-41d1-8c1f-b0bf6f8b9dbf https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_9293478c-d371-41d1-8c1f-b0bf6f8b9dbf#comment https://silverlighthack.com/syndication.axd?post=9293478c-d371-41d1-8c1f-b0bf6f8b9dbf alvinashcraft.com on Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked Pingback from alvinashcraft.com<br /><br />Dew Drop - May 27, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_472978f8-ccb8-4a0f-af8b-fc354bd2df02 [email protected] (alvinashcraft.com) https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_472978f8-ccb8-4a0f-af8b-fc354bd2df02 Fri, 22 May 2009 13:09:13 -1100 alvinashcraft.com https://silverlighthack.com/pingback.axd https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_472978f8-ccb8-4a0f-af8b-fc354bd2df02 https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_472978f8-ccb8-4a0f-af8b-fc354bd2df02#comment https://silverlighthack.com/syndication.axd?post=472978f8-ccb8-4a0f-af8b-fc354bd2df02 David on Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked "Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should've Looked" or "Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked" https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_91d74795-5b6a-44b4-96a6-7277460db700 [email protected] (David) https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_91d74795-5b6a-44b4-96a6-7277460db700 Sat, 23 May 2009 09:44:40 -1100 David https://silverlighthack.com/pingback.axd https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_91d74795-5b6a-44b4-96a6-7277460db700 https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_91d74795-5b6a-44b4-96a6-7277460db700#comment https://silverlighthack.com/syndication.axd?post=91d74795-5b6a-44b4-96a6-7277460db700 TD on Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked HAVE. How it should HAVE looked. <br /><br />What you wrote makes no sense.<br /> https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a5fa46bd-efea-4ad5-9061-c118a95718d7 [email protected] (TD) https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a5fa46bd-efea-4ad5-9061-c118a95718d7 Sun, 24 May 2009 04:04:39 -1100 TD https://silverlighthack.com/pingback.axd https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a5fa46bd-efea-4ad5-9061-c118a95718d7 https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a5fa46bd-efea-4ad5-9061-c118a95718d7#comment https://silverlighthack.com/syndication.axd?post=a5fa46bd-efea-4ad5-9061-c118a95718d7 Kelsey Grammar on Visual Studio 2010 - How It Should Have Looked OK, I can overlook many things, but I have to draw the line somewhere. I can't believe that an otherwise smart, successful person can go through life saying "should of" instead of "should have" without realizing that it doesn't even make sense. <br /><br />Sheesh!<br /> https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a87ebaaf-862c-4a92-88b7-3d5182ed830e [email protected] (Kelsey Grammar) https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a87ebaaf-862c-4a92-88b7-3d5182ed830e Sun, 24 May 2009 20:03:15 -1100 Kelsey Grammar https://silverlighthack.com/pingback.axd https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a87ebaaf-862c-4a92-88b7-3d5182ed830e https://silverlighthack.com/post/2009/05/26/Visual-Studio-2010-How-It-Should-of-Looked.aspx#id_a87ebaaf-862c-4a92-88b7-3d5182ed830e#comment https://silverlighthack.com/syndication.axd?post=a87ebaaf-862c-4a92-88b7-3d5182ed830e